Preston Guillory v. City of Anaheim

Good Law
979 F.2d 854·1992 WL 341338·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35746
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 199289-55662California1,634 words

Opinion

Opinion

979 F.2d 854 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Preston GUILLORY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ANAHEIM, et. al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-55662. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 20, 1992. Decided Nov. 19, 1992. Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, REINHARDT and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * FACTS 2 Preston Guillory is a private investigator and a vocal critic of the Orange County Sheriff's Department and its chief, Brad Gates. Guillory has publicly criticized Sheriff Gates in newspaper articles; he supported candidates for sheriff who ran against Gates; and he worked for individuals who sued Gates for an alleged spying incident. In 1979, Guillory sued the Department and individual officers over the Department's policy for issuing concealed weapons permits. See Guillory v. County of Orange, 731 F.2d 1379 (9th Cir.1984). 3 In 1984, Guillory was hired to assist in a third party's lawsuit against Gates and other members…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.