Atkins, In re

Good Law
979 F.2d 854·1992 WL 344923·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35749
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 199291-35938California1,255 words

Opinion

Opinion

979 F.2d 854 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Roger M. ATKINS; Joyce Atkins, Debtors. Ronald A. WATSON, as Trustee of the Estate of Roger M. Atkins and Joyce J. Atkins, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAGEN, TREMAINE, KRIEGER, SCHMEER & NEILL, an Oregon Partnership; Davis, Wright & Tremaine, an Oregon Partnership, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35938. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1992. Decided Nov. 20, 1992. Before TANG, BRUNETTI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ronald A. Watson, Chapter 7 trustee (Trustee), appeals the summary judgment dismissing his complaint to recover payments made by Debtors' wholly owned corporation to Ragen, Tremaine, Krieger, Schmeer & Neill (Ragen). The Trustee asserts that the payments should be considered property of the Debtors because Debtors owned and controlled the corporation. We affirm. BACKGROUND FACTS 3 Roger M. Atkins and Joyce J. Atkins (Debtors) were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.