Hananya Amir v. William H. Reed, Director of the Contract Audit Agency

979 F.2d 854 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Hananya AMIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William H. REED, Director of the Contract Audit Agency, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-56437. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 21, 1992. * Decided Nov. 18, 1992. Before CHOY, SNEED and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges: 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The district court dismissed Hananya Amir's Title VII action on the grounds that he failed to exhaust administrative remedies and failed to perfect service of process on the defendant. We do not reach these grounds because we conclude that Amir's notice of appeal was not timely filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 Amir did not file his notice of appeal within sixty days of the district court's order dismissing his action as required by Federal Rule Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1). A motions panel of this court nevertheless denied appellee's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction,…