Louellen E. Jeong v. California Pacific Annual Conference David Lehmberg Rich Garner Ed Hansen Jack M. Tuell

979 F.2d 855 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louellen E. JEONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA PACIFIC ANNUAL CONFERENCE; David Lehmberg; Rich Garner; Ed Hansen; Jack M. Tuell, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55370. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Nov. 12, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louellen Edwards Jeong appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her action against the California Pacific Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church and individual defendants for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's dismissal of Jeong's action. McCalden v. California Library Ass'n, 955 F.2d 1214 , 1219 (9th Cir.1990). We construe all allegations of material fact in the complaint as true and view them in the light most favorable to the…