Jesse Antonio Salas v. Roger W. Crist United States Parole Board Commission

979 F.2d 855 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jesse Antonio SALAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roger W. CRIST; United States Parole Board Commission, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-16259. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Nov. 18, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jesse Antonio Salas, an Arizona state prisoner who is also on probation from a federal conviction, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas petition. Salas contends that the district court erred in refusing to grant a hearing to determine whether he violated his probation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and review the denial de novo. Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988). We affirm. 3 If a federal defendant is alleged to have violated the terms of his probation, the United States Parole Commission may…