Nolan Edward Klein v. John Ignacio

979 F.2d 855 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nolan Edward KLEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John IGNACIO, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15235. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Nov. 12, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nolan E. Klein appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his civil rights action alleging that he was denied due process when he was permitted visitation with his family members only under restrictive conditions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990). Summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence, construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, shows that there is…