Chand Kumari v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

979 F.2d 855 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Chand KUMARI, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70441. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. Decided Nov. 19, 1992. Before SNEED, ALARCON and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Chand Kumari seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) final order denying her request for asylum under section 108(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), and for withholding of deportation under § 243(h). The Immigration Judge ("IJ") determined that Kumari's testimony did not support her claim for asylum and withholding of deportation because she was not a credible witness. The BIA affirmed the IJ's adverse credibility findings. We hold that the BIA's adverse credibility findings are supported by substantial evidence. We thus deny the petition and affirm the decision of the BIA. I. 3 Kumari entered the United States on May…