Oregon State v. Edward E. Allen

979 F.2d 855 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. OREGON STATE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward E. ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-36333. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1992. * Decided Nov. 20, 1992. Before TANG, BRUNETTI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Edward Allen appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We affirm. 3 * Appellant brought the instant action in forma pauperis against the State of Oregon Probation Department and JoAnn Price, an employee of that department, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . He complains that Ms. Price "has written a presentence investigation report that is incorrect and contains serious libelous material," and has thereby violated appellant's constitutional rights. By way of relief, appellant requests the court to "correct this information and award plaintiff one million dollars." 4 The district court dismissed appellant's complaint on…