Louis C. Sheptin v. Thomas R. Kindt, Warden

979 F.2d 855 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louis C. SHEPTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Thomas R. KINDT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-55147. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Nov. 18, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louis C. Sheptin, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. He contends that the district court erred by denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his claim that the United States Parole Commission (Commission) acted outside its statutory authority by failing to hold a parole revocation hearing after the execution of a parole violator warrant. He also contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider his habeas petition because he filed it in Indiana district court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We review de novo, Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162…