United States v. Everett Albert Green

Good Law
979 F.2d 856·1992 WL 337708·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35804
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 199291-10403California938 words

Opinion

Opinion

979 F.2d 856 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Everett Albert GREEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10403. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 28, 1992. * Decided Nov. 18, 1992. Before KILKENNY, GOODWIN and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Everett Albert Green, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence imposed following a jury conviction for mailing an explosive device, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1716 ; unlawfully manufacturing an explosive device, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (f); possessing an unregistered access device, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (d); and being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g). 3 Green contends that the district court erred in denying his section 2255 motion without an evidentiary hearing on his claims of (1)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.