United States v. Frank Leslie Hall

979 F.2d 856 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank Leslie HALL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-55352. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Nov. 16, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank Leslie Hall, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the summary denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Hall was convicted following a jury trial for three counts of armed bank robbery and two counts of unarmed bank robbery. He contends that the district court erred by denying his claims of vindictive prosecution, ineffective assistance of counsel, and sentencing errors. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo, Doganiere v. United States, 914 F.2d 165, 167 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 1398 (1991), and we affirm. 3 First, Hall contends that he was…