United States v. Joshua W. Fenwick
Opinion
Opinion
979 F.2d 856 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joshua W. FENWICK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10398. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1992. Decided Nov. 23, 1992. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 This case began when Joshua Fenwick filed a report with the FBI in Guam complaining of unauthorized withdrawals from the bank account of his company, Disco Light House, by its manager, John Limehouse. He also reported to the FBI that a Bank of Guam employee, Edna Silpao, had altered the signature card for the Disco Light House bank account. After Fenwick testified at her trial as a witness for the government, Silpao was convicted of the federal offense of altering bank documents. Fenwick subsequently testified before a grand jury investigating Limehouse. 3 Ultimately, it was Fenwick who was charged in a seven count…