Witte v. Lakeside Inn and Casino

Good Law
979 F.2d 857·1992 WL 332203·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35832
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 199291-16530California790 words

Opinion

Opinion

979 F.2d 857 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur Paul WITTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAKESIDE INN AND CASINO; Richard Jeha; Stanley W. Sperling; William F. Kartozian; Sam Anderson; Michael H. Bradford, Official Capacity as owners, individually and in their official capacity as owners, managers and employees of Lakeside Inn and Casino, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16530. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1992. * Decided Nov. 12, 1992. Before CHOY, NOONAN and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This is an action by a former employee against his employer alleging sexual harassment in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., and several pendant state claims. The district court granted summary judgment for the employer on the federal claims, and refused to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. We agree with the district court that there are no genuine issues of material fact regarding the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.