United States v. Ronald Harold Semenak

Good Law
979 F.2d 857·1992 WL 332192·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35833
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 199291-50858California1,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

979 F.2d 857 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Harold SEMENAK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50858. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1992. * Decided Nov. 12, 1992. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and TROTT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald Harold Semenak appeals the sentence he received after he entered a plea of guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 1708 (1988) for knowingly possessing 305 pieces of stolen mail. He maintains the government violated the plea agreement by not recommending a two-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 (1991). He also argues the district court erred by not applying that two-point downward adjustment. We affirm. 3 * Semenak first argues the government violated the terms of the plea agreement which required the government to recommend a two-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.