Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. v. Grossarth

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 15516·979 F.2d 1377·23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20498·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 30275·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9274
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 199291-35790California1,245 words

Opinion

Opinion

979 F.2d 1377 23 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,498 OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL, INC., a non-profit corporation; Portland Audubon Society, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Orville GROSSARTH, in his official capacity as Supervisor, Fremont National Forest; John Butruille, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region; U.S. Forest Service, an agency of the United States, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35790. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1992. Decided Nov. 19, 1992. Adam J. Berger, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants. Gary Kahn, Reeves, Kahn & Eder, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs-appellants. Victor M. Sher, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert Klarquist, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before: GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges, and KEEP, District Judge. * SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: 1 This case arises out of the United States Forest Service's approval on August 14, 1989, of a timber sale, known as the Auger Timber Sale, in the Fremont National Forest in south central Oregon.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.