Clarence F. Tinsley Marion Tinsley v. Sea-Land Corporation, a Corporation

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 15564·979 F.2d 1382·1992 WL 336915·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 30478·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9337
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 199291-35762California875 words

Opinion

Opinion

This is the second appeal in this personal injury action arising out of an accident on a ship owned and operated by the defendant, Sea-Land Corporation. In its original judgment, the district court found the un-seaworthy condition of defendant’s ship was the sole cause of plaintiffs injuries and awarded damages of $721,673. On appeal, we affirmed the finding of unseaworthiness, but held plaintiffs negligence had contributed to his injuries and remanded for a determination of comparative negligence. 917 F.2d 28 (Table) (text available at 1990 WL 163934 ). The district court found plaintiff 10% negligent and reduced the damage award accordingly. The court also ordered defendant to pay post-judgment interest on the reduced award from the date of the original judgment. Sea-Land timely appeals. We affirm.

The award of postjudgment interest is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 . See Kotsopoulos v. Asturia Shipping Co., 467 F.2d 91, 95 (2d Cir.1972) (award of post-judgment interest in maritime actions is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 ). Section 1961(a) provides “[ijnterest shall be allowed on any money judgment in a civil case recovered in a district court” and “shall be calculated from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.