Ash v. Lake Oswego School District, No. 7

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 15793·980 F.2d 585·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 30909·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9482
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 199291-36007California2,432 words

Opinion

Opinion

980 F.2d 585 79 Ed. Law Rep. 408 Stanley E. ASH; Barbara Ash; Christopher Ash, a minor By and Through his natural parents, Stanley E. Ash and Barbara Ash, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 7J, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 91-36007, 91-36008. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1992. Decided Nov. 25, 1992. Robert F. Blackmore, Dunn, Carney, Allen, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs-cross-appellees/cross-appellants. Thomas S. Moore, Portland, Or., for defendant-cross-appellant/cross-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before: TANG, BRUNETTI, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. TANG, Circuit Judge: 1 Lake Oswego School District ("LOSD" or "School District") appeals the judgment of the district court following a bench trial. The district court ruled in favor of plaintiffs Stanley, Barbara, and Christopher Ash on their claims under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. ("IDEA"). The court concluded that LOSD failed to provide Christopher with a free appropriate public education as required by the IDEA. Further,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.