Ash v. Lake Oswego School District, No. 7
Opinion
Opinion
980 F.2d 585 79 Ed. Law Rep. 408 Stanley E. ASH; Barbara Ash; Christopher Ash, a minor By and Through his natural parents, Stanley E. Ash and Barbara Ash, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 7J, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 91-36007, 91-36008. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1992. Decided Nov. 25, 1992. Robert F. Blackmore, Dunn, Carney, Allen, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs-cross-appellees/cross-appellants. Thomas S. Moore, Portland, Or., for defendant-cross-appellant/cross-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before: TANG, BRUNETTI, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. TANG, Circuit Judge: 1 Lake Oswego School District ("LOSD" or "School District") appeals the judgment of the district court following a bench trial. The district court ruled in favor of plaintiffs Stanley, Barbara, and Christopher Ash on their claims under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. ("IDEA"). The court concluded that LOSD failed to provide Christopher with a free appropriate public education as required by the IDEA. Further,…