In Re Colville Confederated Tribes, William H. Veeder v. Boyd Walton, Jr. State of Oregon, Colville Confederated Tribes, and William H. Veeder, Claimant-Appellant v. Boyd Walton, Jr. Kenna Jean Walton, and State of Washington, Defendant-Intervenor

980 F.2d 736 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re COLVILLE CONFEDERATED TRIBES, Plaintiff, William H. VEEDER Appellant, v. Boyd WALTON, Jr.; State of Oregon, et al, Defendants-Appellees. COLVILLE CONFEDERATED TRIBES, Plaintiff, and William H. Veeder, Claimant-Appellant, v. Boyd WALTON, Jr.; Kenna Jean Walton, Defendants-Appellees, and STATE of Washington, Defendant-Intervenor. Nos. 91-35490, 91-35755. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1992. * Decided Nov. 13, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, FLETCHER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Attorney William H. Veeder appeals from the district court's imposition of two post-judgment sanctions against him. 1 The first sanction was imposed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. After Veeder had appealed that sanction order, the district court sanctioned him under a local rule for conduct occurring during his dispute over the first sanction. The district court, in entering…