Teshome Abate v. Walter Walton, Chaplain Chaplain Hubbard

980 F.2d 736 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Teshome ABATE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Walter WALTON, Chaplain; Chaplain Hubbard; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15613. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. * Decided Dec. 2, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Teshome Abate appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the district court's December 5, 1991 order granting defendants' motion to amend the judgment. Abate also challenges the court's denial of his motions for consolidation and for disqualification of the district court judge. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. 3 On May 17, 1989, Abate filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against three prison chaplains. Abate claimed the defendants violated his civil rights by failing to provide him a diet that satisfied the…