Harvey L. Beagle, II v. Roger Gooch Barbara Nelson

980 F.2d 736 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harvey L. BEAGLE, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roger GOOCH; Barbara Nelson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35304. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. * Decided Dec. 2, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Harvey Beagle, a Washington state prisoner, appeals following the district court's summary judgment dismissing his civil rights action. Beagle contends the district court erred by denying (1) Beagle's motion to amend his complaint, (2) his motion to consolidate this action with his other pending actions, and (3) his request for additional discovery prior to summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's actions for abuse of discretion. Texaco, Inc. v. Ponsoldt, 939 F.2d 794, 798 (9th Cir.1991) (denial of motion for leave to amend complaint); NLRB v. Yuba Natural Resources, Inc.,…