Rudy Carrillo, Sr. v. Ira Reiner

Good Law
980 F.2d 736·1992 WL 355507·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35464
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 199292-55115California1,041 words

Opinion

Opinion

980 F.2d 736 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rudy CARRILLO, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ira REINER, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-55115. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 26, 1992. * Decided Dec. 2, 1992. Before CHOY, SNEED and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rudy Carrillo, Sr. timely appeals pro se the district court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his conviction for resisting arrest. We affirm the district court. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW 3 Carrillo was tried before a jury and convicted of resisting arrest in violation of Cal.Penal Code § 148. He was placed on probation with the condition that he spend the first 210 days in the county jail. 4 Carrillo maintained that he was provoked by the arresting officer and acted in self defense. At trial, Carrillo and his sister Rosie Carrillo (a codefendant) testified to a pattern of police harassment by the arresting officer, including…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.