Julia R.G. Coleman v. Mercy General of Sacramento

980 F.2d 736 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Julia R.G. COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERCY GENERAL OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16201. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Dec. 9, 1992. Before SNEED, ALARCON and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Julia R.G. Coleman timely appeals pro se the entry of summary judgment in favor of appellee, Mercy General Hospital (Mercy), dismissing her Title VII employment discrimination suit. We affirm on the ground that appellant's suit is timed barred. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW 3 Coleman is an Hispanic woman who was employed by Mercy as a registered nurse. Coleman alleges that she was subjected to different terms and conditions of employment, harassed and intimidated on the basis of race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Coleman alleges a pattern of discriminatory acts occurred from 1982 to 1987, and that…