Randy Fisher v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent

Good Law
980 F.2d 737·1992 WL 354552·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35504
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 199292-35006California241 words

Opinion

Opinion

980 F.2d 737 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randy FISHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-35006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1992. * Decided Nov. 27, 1992. 1 Before TANG, BRUNETTI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges 2 ORDER ** 3 Appellant Randy Fisher appeals the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition. In the petition, Fisher alleged that (1) his conviction was obtained by the use of evidence gained pursuant to an unconstitutional search and seizure; (2) his conviction was obtained by the use of inadmissible and prejudicial evidence; (3) his conviction was obtained by the use of inadmissible hearsay evidence; and, (4) he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel. 4 Appellant only pursued the ineffective assistance of counsel claim on this appeal. 5 Based on the reasoning in the relevant portions of the November 21, 1991 order issued by Judge Hogan,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.