Epperly

980 F.2d 737 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gordon W. EPPERLY; Esther K. Epperly; Niels P. Epperly; Bobbi J. Epperly, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES (U.S. Congress); IRS Employee No. 2981806539, and a number of unknown Employees of U.S., Defendants-Appellees. 1 No. 91-35862. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1992. * Decided Nov. 24, 1992. 3 Before HUG, and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and PRO, District Judge. ** 4 MEMORANDUM *** 5 On November 2, 1990, Appellants Gordon, Esther, Niels, and Bobbi Epperly ("Epperlys"), appearing pro se, filed an amended complaint asserting various claims including: (1) that several unidentified employees of the United States Government have "trespassed" on their real property located in Alaska by arbitrarily classifying such land as "wetlands", and that such classification constitutes a taking of property without compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment; (2) that Appellants are…