Jeunehomme v. County of Los Angeles

980 F.2d 737 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Oliver JEUNEHOMME, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, in the official capacity for Los Angeles County Sheriffs Hollowell and Sgt. Kott in personal capacities; Bell City Police Officer; City of Bell, in the official capacity for Bell City Police Officers Hernandez, Bruce and Sgt. Loder, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55189. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. * Decided Dec. 1, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oliver Jeunehomme appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(j) for failure to timely serve the defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm as modified. 3 We affirm the district court's action on any ground finding support in the record. Salmeron v. United States, 724 F.2d 1357, 1364 (9th Cir.1983). A ruling on…