Hulen T. Harrell v. J.W. Huskey, Warden

Good Law
980 F.2d 737·1992 WL 355520·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35511
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 199292-15995California666 words

Opinion

Opinion

980 F.2d 737 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Hulen T. HARRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.W. HUSKEY, Warden, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15995. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. * Decided Dec. 2, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hulen Harrell, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the magistrate judge's stay of Harrell's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against prison officials and staff. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review a district court's denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion, Thompson v. Housing Auth. of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829, 832 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 829 (1986), and we vacate and remand. 3 Harrell filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against prison officials and staff seeking damages and injunctive relief on the ground…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.