Getrost v. United States

980 F.2d 737 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Audrey J. GETROST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Franchise Tax Board; Alpha Investment Trust, Ltd.; Eton Trust Company, Ltd.; Richard Hanson, Trustee; Poway Sheriff's Dept.; John Davidson, Michael M. McNally; Randy Sherman; Nancy Schwartz; William Thomas; Robert Getrost, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56280. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. * Decided Dec. 2, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Audrey Getrost appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her action against the United States. 1 Getrost contends that the district court erred by dismissing the United States from this action because: (1) it misconstrued her suit for quiet title as one for wrongful levy; and (2) she filed her action within the applicable statute of limitations for wrongful levy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 ,…