Salmon River Concerned Citizens v. Robertson

Good Law
980 F.2d 738·1992 WL 354225·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35451
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 30, 199291-16369California834 words

Opinion

Opinion

980 F.2d 738 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SALMON RIVER CONCERNED CITIZENS, California Coalition for Alternatives To Pesticides Inc., Safe Alternatives for Our Forest Environment, Inc., Northcoast Environmental Center, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Dale ROBERTSON, Chief Forester United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Defendant, California Forestry Association, Intervenor-Appellant. No. 91-16369. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1992. Decided Nov. 30, 1992. Before SNEED, ALARCON and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant California Forestry Association challenges the district court's denial of intervention as of right in the underlying NEPA compliance suit concerning the sufficiency of the Environmental Impact Statement for Region 5 of the National Forest System. We affirm. I. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 3 In the underlying suit, the appellees, Salmon River Concerned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.