Glynn Edward Scott v. Ron Angelone

Good Law
980 F.2d 738·1992 WL 354598·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35526
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 199291-16182California2,458 words

Opinion

Opinion

980 F.2d 738 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Glynn Edward SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron ANGELONE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16182. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1992. * Decided Nov. 27, 1992. Before SNEED, ALARCON and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Glynn Edward Scott appeals from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Ron Angelone and Sallye C. Limbert, employees of the Nevada Department of Prisons (collectively, the "Department"). Scott seeks reversal on the following grounds: (1) the district court erred in issuing a protective order prohibiting Scott from engaging in discovery pending the district court's ruling on the Department's motion for summary judgment; (2) the district court erred in concluding that the Department afforded Scott adequate due process protections in deducting money from and freezing his inmate trust account; and (3) the district court erred in granting summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.