Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. v. Bureau of Reclamation

Good Law
980 F.2d 738·1992 WL 349256·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35520
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 25, 199292-35042California909 words

Opinion

Opinion

980 F.2d 738 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL, INC., an Oregon non-profit corporation; Wendell Wood; Mark Gaffney, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, et al., Defendant, Klamath Basin Water Users Protective Association, Applicant in Intervention-Appellant. No. 92-35042. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. Decided Nov. 25, 1992. Before TANG, BRUNETTI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Klamath Basin Water Users Protective Association appeals the district court's denial of its motion to intervene as a defendant in a suit brought by the Oregon Natural Resources Council against the Bureau of Reclamation alleging violations of the Endangered Species Act. 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 et seq. Intervention was sought as a matter of right under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a) and, alternatively, by permission under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(b). We reverse the district court's denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.