United States v. Todd Summerlin Alexander

980 F.2d 738 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Todd Summerlin ALEXANDER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50079. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. * Decided Dec. 1, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Todd Summerlin Alexander appeals his 188-month sentence, imposed following conviction on a guilty plea, for robbery of a savings and loan association in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Alexander contends that the district erred by sentencing him as a career offender under the United States Sentencing Guidelines because his California conviction for second degree robbery is not a "crime of violence" and hence not a predicate offense under U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.1 and 4B1.2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review the legality of a sentence de novo. United States v. McDougherty, 920 F.2d 569,…