Adelheid Maria Praml v. United States

980 F.2d 738 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Adelheid Maria PRAML, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 90-10604. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 25, 1992. Before GOODWIN, CANBY and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 After a remand for resentencing, Adelheid Maria Praml appeals pro se the district court's judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 In 1988, a jury convicted Praml of two counts of passport fraud, one count of misuse of a social security number, and one count of possession of a false identification document. Praml appealed her convictions, and we held that the two counts of passport fraud were multiplicitous. We accordingly remanded for resentencing with instructions to vacate and stay the judgment of conviction on one of the two counts of passport fraud. In all other respects, we affirmed her convictions. United States v. Praml, No. 88-1267,…