Securities and Exchange Commission, and Fritz Ott Bill R. Frisbie, Claimants-Appellants v. National Real Estate Fund

Good Law
980 F.2d 738·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35453
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 199286-1645California874 words

Opinion

Opinion

980 F.2d 738 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, and Fritz Ott; Bill R. Frisbie, Claimants-Appellants, v. NATIONAL REAL ESTATE FUND; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-1645. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. * Decided Dec. 2, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Fritz Ott and Bill R. Frisbie appeal pro se the district court's order (1) granting defendants' motion for summary judgment, and (2) permanently enjoining Ott and Frisbie from filing any future actions against defendants. We dismiss in part and affirm in part. 3 * It is well settled that "[a] case becomes moot when a court cannot grant effective relief, ... and where it is unlikely that the precise conditions of the case could ever recur." Burlington N.R.R. v. Crow Tribal Council, 940 F.2d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir.1991) (citation omitted). "The test for mootness of an appeal is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.