United States v. Shane Arthur James

980 F.2d 739 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shane Arthur JAMES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30238. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submission Deferred July 6, 1992. Submitted July 13, 1992. Decided Dec. 9, 1992. Before ALARCON, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Shane Arthur James appeals his rape conviction committed on the Quinault Indian Reservation in the State of Washington. In a separate published opinion, we hold the indictment was sufficient to withstand a Fed.R.Crim.P. 34 challenge after the verdict, and that the district court properly quashed a subpoena addressed to an agency of the Quinault Indian Nation. We here address the remaining issues: 3 (1) Subpoena to Washington Department of Health and Social Services. After service of the subpoena directing production of "any and all information concerning Katie Kawoosh, including, but not…