United States v. Keith David Kuehl

980 F.2d 739 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith David KUEHL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50452. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 8, 1992. * Decided Nov. 27, 1992. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, DAVID R. THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Defendant Keith Kuehl appeals his conviction for manufacturing counterfeit currency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 471 , dealing in counterfeit currency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 473 , and conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 . At issue is the motion to suppress real evidence and admissions. We affirm. 3 Kuehl argues that the district court erred in admitting evidence obtained during a warrantless search of his trailer because his brother Albert lacked authority to consent to the search. We have not decided whether the existence of authority of consent is reviewed de novo or for clear error. United…