United States v. Neil Woodman, Robert Thomas Homick, and Steven Michael Homick

Good Law
980 F.2d 740
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 199391-10216California4,374 words

Opinion

Opinion

980 F.2d 740 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neil WOODMAN, Robert Thomas Homick, and Steven Michael Homick, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 91-10216, 91-10217 and 91-10238. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1992. Decided Dec. 4, 1992. As Amended Jan. 25 and May 10, 1993. Before BOOCHEVER, NOONAN and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Neil Woodman appeals his conviction for interstate travel in the aid of murder for hire. Appellant Steven Michael Homick (hereinafter S. Homick) appeals his convictions for RICO, interstate transportation of stolen property, conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, interstate travel in aid of racketeering, and interstate travel in the aid of murder for hire. Appellant Robert Thomas Homick (hereinafter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.