United States v. Gary A. Strunk

Good Law
980 F.2d 740·1992 WL 357155·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 36335
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 199292-35279California685 words

Opinion

Opinion

980 F.2d 740 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary A. STRUNK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-35279. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. * Decided Dec. 3, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gary Alan Strunk, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas motion challenging his guilty plea conviction for narcotics violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 Strunk pled guilty to a five count indictment for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, use of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, use of a telephone to facilitate cocaine distribution, and two counts of distribution of cocaine. Strunk was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 101 months to be followed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.