Lacey Sivak v. Jay Christensen
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 202219-35713California1,751 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JAN 12 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LACEY MARK SIVAK, No. 19-35713
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:16-cv-00189-BLW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JAY CHRISTENSEN,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 9, 2021 Portland, Oregon
Before: GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and R. COLLINS,** District Judge. Concurrence by Judge CHRISTEN
Petitioner Lacey Sivak, an Idaho state prisoner, appeals the district court’s
dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Reviewing de novo questions of law, Rhoades v. Henry, 638 F.3d 1027, 1034 (9th
Cir. 2011), we reverse and remand.
1. The issues were adequately preserved. See Kamen…