Dhirendra Sukul v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 202215-72408California761 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 12 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DHIRENDRA NATH SUKUL, Nos. 15-72408 16-70902 Petitioner, Agency No. A075-731-618 v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 10, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: TASHIMA, M. SMITH, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Dhirendra Nath Sukul, a native and citizen of Fiji, asks this court
to reverse the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of two motions to
reopen his removal proceedings. The parties are familiar with the facts, and so we
do not recount them here. We review the denial of the motions to reopen for abuse
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of discretion, INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323 (1992), and deny…