Longview Fibre Company, James River Ii, Inc., Boise Cascade Corporation, and Weyerhaeuser Company, and Columbia River United and Dioxin/organochlorine Center, Petitioner-Intervenor v. Dana A. Rasmussen, Regional Administrator, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Columbia River United and Dioxin/organochlorine Center v. Dana A. Rasmussen, Regional Administrator, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 16391·980 F.2d 1307·23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20454·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32115·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9798
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 199291-70389California4,360 words

Opinion

Opinion

980 F.2d 1307 23 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,454 LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPANY, James River II, Inc., Boise Cascade Corporation, and Weyerhaeuser Company, Petitioners, and Columbia River United and Dioxin/Organochlorine Center, Petitioner-Intervenor, v. Dana A. RASMUSSEN, Regional Administrator, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. COLUMBIA RIVER UNITED AND DIOXIN/ORGANOCHLORINE CENTER, Petitioner, v. Dana A. RASMUSSEN, Regional Administrator, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. Nos. 91-70389, 91-70398. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1992. Decided Dec. 8, 1992. Beth S. Ginsberg and Karen M. McGaffey, Bogle & Gates, Seattle, Wash., for petitioners. Victor M. Sher, Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner-intervenor and petitioner. Christopher S. Vaden and Diane M. Connolly, Barry M. Hartman, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Roland Dubois, E.P.A., Washington, D.C., and Adrianne Allen, E.P.A., Seattle, Wash., for respondents. Petition for Review of a Decision of the Environmental Protection Agency. Before PREGERSON, TROTT and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.