Mata v. Ricketts

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 15845·981 F.2d 397·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31200·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9521
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 199287-1731California2,421 words

Opinion

Opinion

981 F.2d 397 Luis MATA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James G. RICKETTS, Attorney General of the State of Arizona; Samuel Lewis, Director ADOC; Lloyd Bramlett, Warden, ASPC-F; John Avenenti, Deputy Warden, ASU, Respondents-Appellees. No. 87-1731. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submission Deferred June 16, 1988. Resubmitted Without Further Argument Feb. 1, 1991 * . Decided July 1, 1991. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Nov. 27, 1992. Baron L. Miller, Miller & Miller, San Francisco, CA, for petitioner-appellant. Jack Roberts, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, AZ, for respondents-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before CHOY, GOODWIN, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The opinion filed July 1, 1991, slip op. 8025, and appearing at 937 F.2d 467 (9th Cir.1991) is amended as follows: 2 At slip op. page 8030, paragraph ; 937 F.2d 469 , last full paragraph of left column, delete and replace with the following: 3 Luis argues that the Arizona courts committed various errors with regard to sentencing. He argues that in determining whether the "heinous, cruel, and depraved" aggravating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.