Guaranty National Insurance Company, a Colorado Corporation v. American Motorists Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 17053·981 F.2d 1108·1992 WL 370263·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32758·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10119
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 18, 199291-35836California270 words

Opinion

Opinion

The decision of the district court reported at 758 F.Supp. 1394 (D.Mont.1991) is affirmed, with this limitation.

One of the parties to the case in the district court was Harbor Insurance Company, which had issued a true excess insurance policy. In this setting, a true excess policy is one which is specifically intended to only come into play when the limits of the underlying coverage are exhausted. It is issued in anticipation of the existence of the underlying policy and is priced in the belief that the excess carrier will not have to provide a defense. See Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Continental Nat’l Am. Ins. Cos., 861 F.2d 1184, 1187 (9th Cir.1989) (“an excess insurer predicates the premiums it charges upon the obligations that it and the primary insurer assume, including the primary insurer’s obligation to defend all suits until exhaustion of its liability limits”).

The dispute resolved by the district court here was between two carriers which had each issued a “primary” insurance policy. Due to the policy provisions involved, or the relationship among the parties to the accident, the coverage of one of the policies had become “excess” to the coverage afforded by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.