Charles M. Byers v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office

981 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles M. BYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15707. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. * Decided Dec. 7, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles M. Byers, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment against him in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, and the district court's subsequent denial of his motion for reconsideration. 1 Byers contends that the defendants violated his civil rights while he was a pretrial detainee at the Maricopa County Jail. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's summary judgment de novo, Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1044 (9th Cir.1989), and the denial of a motion for reconsideration for an abuse of discretion, Fuller v. M.G. Jewelry, 950 F.2d 1437, 1441…