Ayala v. Los Angeles Police Dept

Good Law
981 F.2d 1257·1992 WL 371318·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 36596
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 199291-55729California844 words

Opinion

Opinion

981 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eduardo AYALA, Gilberto Ayala, Irma Arroyo, Elvira Pasillas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, City of Los Angeles, Darryl Gates, Police Chief, Officers I-XX, Rampart Division LAPD, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55729. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 9, 1992. Decided Dec. 16, 1992. Before HUG, FLETCHER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants Eduardo and Gilberto Ayala, Irma Arroyo and Elvira Pasillas appeal the district court's denial of their Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for reinstatement of an action dismissed by the district court for failure to prosecute. We affirm. Facts and Proceedings Below 3 Appellants filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the Los Angeles Police Department, the City of Los Angeles, and various Los Angeles Police officers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.