Allison Chapman v. State of Arizona City of Mesa, a Municiapl Corporation Harold Reeb Lee Allred

981 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Allison CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA; City of Mesa, a Municiapl Corporation; Harold Reeb; Lee Allred, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15816. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 21, 1992. * Decided Dec. 24, 1992. Before TANG, NOONAN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Allison Chapman appeals pro se the district court's order denying her motion for a preliminary injunction in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the State of Arizona, the Arizona Department of Transportation, the City of Mesa, and various city officials. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1). 1 We affirm. 3 We review the district court's order for abuse of discretion and to determine if the court based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact. Religious Technology Center, Church of Scientology Int'l, Inc. v. Scott, 869…