Lillian D'AntignAc v. Daryl v. Gates, Chief of Police

Good Law
981 F.2d 1257·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 3014
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 4, 199391-55749California281 words

Opinion

Opinion

981 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lillian D'ANTIGNAC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daryl V. GATES, Chief of Police, et al., Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 91-55749, 91-55971. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 16, 1992. As Amended Jan. 4, 1993. Before D.W. NELSON, BOOCHEVER and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The district court had discretion to award costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 . We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion denying costs and therefore affirm its order filed July 2, 1992 denying the motion for taxation of costs. 2 The district court's order filed May 16, 1991 requiring the appellant's counsel to file satisfactions of judgment as specified therein, and its order filed May 28, 1991 denying ex parte application for modification of the May 16, 1991 order are also affirmed. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge, partial dissent. 5 Because the City did not pay the stipulated amount, nor apply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.