John Wesley Bergdahl v. James Blodgett

981 F.2d 1257 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Wesley BERGDAHL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James BLODGETT, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-35314. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 23, 1992. * Decided Dec. 8, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jon Wesley Bergdahl, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and review the denial de novo. Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989). We affirm. 3 Bergdahl raises the following three claims on appeal: 1) his rights under the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment were violated because he received a longer sentence from the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (hereinafter ISRB) for violating his parole than he would have received under the Washington Sentencing Reform Act, Wash.Rev.Code § 9.94A,…