Brant R. Honkanen v. Mike Doyle

981 F.2d 1258 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Brant R. HONKANEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mike DOYLE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16100. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 17, 1992. * Decided Dec. 22, 1992. Before GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Brant Honkanen appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of all defendants in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The case arises out of the placement of Honkanen's son Brian in protective custody after he complained he had been beaten by his father, Honkanen's subsequent arrest and conviction for willful child abuse, and a later arrest of Honkanen for various traffic violations. Honkanen brought this § 1983 action against various officials of the State of Nevada for alleged civil rights violations associated with these events. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm the…