Gabriel Medina-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

981 F.2d 1258 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gabriel MEDINA-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 90-70345. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 17, 1992. Decided Dec. 8, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, FLETCHER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Gabriel Medina-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) decision affirming the denial of his application for voluntary departure under 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (e) (1992). He argues that the immigration judge (IJ) erred by refusing to allow his witnesses to testify at the deportation hearing. He also contends that the BIA erred when it determined that he did not merit the favorable exercise of discretion. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we remand for further proceedings. 3 * Medina contends that the BIA erred by affirming the IJ's denial of…