Raymond Ludwig Frost v. Thomas Lutz

981 F.2d 1258 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond Ludwig FROST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas LUTZ, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16053. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1992. * Decided Dec. 11, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond Ludwig Frost, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for preliminary injunctive relief. He contends that prison officials have been deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs by: (1) delaying medical treatment and (2) providing inadequate medical treatment in violation of the eighth amendment. This court's review of an order denying preliminary injunctive relief is limited to determining whether the district court has abused its discretion by using erroneous legal standards or by using clearly erroneous findings of fact. Fund for Animals, Inc. v. Lujan, 962 F.2d 1391, 1400 (9th…